No Explanatory Power

Observe carefully and you will see that Materialism, Naturalism, Darwinism, Nihilism, Atheism, and their derivatives have NO explanatory power when it comes to Psyche or Syntropy. Psyche is Syntropy. It is without a beginning of days or an end of years. It is eternal and everlasting.

Psyche has been experienced and observed by Near-Death Experiencers and Out-of-Body Explorers. Psyche is observed as being a pin-prick of light or a spark. Psyche or Intelligence is experienced first-hand or first-person as an immaterial viewpoint in space. A spirit body (and later a physical body) expands the range and the scope of a Spark or a Psyche exponentially. Doesn’t it?

Quantum Mechanics is Syntropy – it’s eternal and everlasting, without a beginning of days or an end of years. Physical matter and entropy had a beginning which means that they can theoretically have an end, when they get absorbed back into Syntropy.

Classical Physics or Physicalism has NO explanatory power when it comes to Quantum Mechanics, Psyche, and Syntropy. The Materialists and Naturalists can’t explain Psyche, Quantum Mechanics, Consciousness, nor Syntropy in any way that makes logical sense to them or to us. Instead, these people assure us that these things do not exist. That’s how they explain them, by stating that they do not exist. But, does that really explain them? Is that really science?

Materialism, Naturalism, Physicalism, Darwinism, Nihilism, Behaviorism, Determinism, Physical Reductionism, and Atheism make for Bad Science because they are severely lacking when it comes to explanatory power.

Science is observation and experience. In contrast, the major premises or hidden assumptions of Materialism, Naturalism, Darwinism, Nihilism, and Atheism have NEVER been experienced nor observed. They can’t be because they are a figment of the imagination. They don’t exist in any real physical sense.

Technically, natural selection doesn’t even exist – not in any real tangible physical form. It’s an idea – survival of the fittest – and nothing more. Natural selection doesn’t exist as a person, or a force, or a physical mechanism that can produce genetic change or genetic programming. Natural selection doesn’t do anything. Natural selection doesn’t touch our genes! The only time it comes into play is when you get selected against and die. Natural selection results in death or extinction – it’s entropy. There’s NO physical mechanism for growth, or change, or progress, or programming, or genetic design associated natural selection. Natural selection is nothing but luck or chance; and, every scientist knows that blind luck cannot design and create anything at all.

In principle, natural selection is a philosophical assumption – a figment of the imagination. It’s something that they made up out of thin air to explain their philosophical ideas or their religion. They explained it by naming it. There’s NO physical mechanism associated with natural selection that can produce genetic change or evolution. Scary, is it not? They built a whole “science discipline” on something that doesn’t touch our genes and can’t touch our genes.

The idea that aggression is an instinct collapsed as the list of supposed human instincts grew to include nearly every conceivable human behavior. Nearly 6,000 supposed instincts were enumerated in one 1924 survey of social science books. The social scientists had tried to explain social behavior by naming it. It’s tempting to play this explaining-by-naming game: “Why do sheep stay together?” “Because of their herd instinct.” “How do you know they have a herd instinct?” “Just look at them: They’re always together!”

Instinct theory also fails to account for the variations in aggressiveness from person to person and culture to culture. How would a shared human instinct for aggression explain the difference between the peaceful Iroquois before White invaders came and the hostile Iroquois after the invasion? Although aggression is biologically influenced, the human propensity to aggress does not qualify as instinctive behavior. (Social Psychology, p. 356.)

Natural selection, the theory of evolution, and survival of the fittest are also based upon explaining-by-naming or a carefully crafted tautology. It’s a house of straw with no foundational support.

“Why did those chimp-like ancestors survive when everything else went extinct?” “Because of natural selection or survival of the fittest.” “How do you know that it was natural selection that preserved them and kept them alive?” “Well just look at them: They survived!”

There’s the sum-total of the theory of evolution right there in a nutshell. It’s obvious that the theory of evolution and natural selection are true – just look at all the critters that survived! It’s obvious and clear that natural selection and random mutations can design and create anything they set their minds to, because here you are.

They explained it by naming it! That’s a logic fallacy!

The whole theory of evolution is based upon a bunch of different logic fallacies such as these. Logic fallacies or falsehoods can’t be used to build the truth; but, that doesn’t stop the Materialists, Naturalists, Darwinists, and Atheists from trying to do so. Nevertheless, the whole of their “science” is nothing more than a carefully crafted deception and lie. It’s a fictional just-so story that they made up out of nothing. They explained it by naming it.

Natural selection doesn’t do anything. Natural selection doesn’t touch our genes. The physical process that does the change within our genes is the random mutations that take place during genetic recombination while our gametes (egg and sperm) are being made. Genetic recombination is the mechanism of change where evolution or genetic drift is concerned.

Yes, the genes are real. Yes, random mutations do indeed happen. But, random mutations are entropy; and, entropy cannot design and create. Entropy can only do disorder, disease, cancer, death, and extinction. There’s NOTHING there within the theory of evolution that can actually design and create. There’s nothing within the theory that can do programming, or the production of brand new genes and proteins from atoms. There’s NO physical mechanism within the theory of evolution that can produce proteins and their matching genes from scratch or from atoms. There’s NO science! The theory of evolution was explained into existence by being named into existence. In other words, it’s a fictional story that they made up out of thin air.

By the way, when it comes to psychology, it should have been called a Genetic Perspective and not the evolutionary perspective. The theory of evolution is in constant dispute; whereas, the genes are not. The genes are science because they have been experienced and observed; whereas, creation by Mutation/Selection has not. Random mutations and natural selection cannot design and create anything. It’s physically impossible. They are prevented from doing so by entropy or the second law of thermodynamics. Materialism, Naturalism, Darwinism, Nihilism, Atheism, and Classical Physics are based upon entropy. Entropy cannot design and create. It requires some type of Syntropy in order to be able to design and create proteins and their matching genes from scratch.

ONLY Syntropy, Intelligence, or Someone Psyche can design and create. By choosing to bring Psyche, Quantum Mechanics, and Syntropy into play, we can literally explain everything that comes our way. Try it. You might like it. I know I did. I’m a scientist; and, I have observed that Psyche or Syntropy has an infinite amount of explanatory power. In comparison with that, Materialism, Naturalism, and Darwinism are absolutely worthless because they have NO explanatory power when it comes to the science that matters most.

Ask yourself, “How do the Materialists and Naturalists explain Psyche, Syntropy, and Action at a Distance?”

What’s the answer?

Remember, Action at a Distance as well as the Quantum Zeno Effect have been experienced and observed in science experiments. They are real. They truly exist.

The Materialists, Naturalists, Darwinists, Nihilists, and Atheists explain Psyche, Syntropy, and Action at a Distance by labeling them or categorizing them as NON-EXISTENT. Once again, these people explain-it-by-naming-it or explain it by labeling it as non-existent; but, is that really a scientific explanation, or is it a dodge?

So, ask yourself, “When it comes to science, who are the Real Scientists and who are the fakes?”

Well, what do we observe?

We observe the New Atheists calling themselves the Brights. The Atheists in general label themselves as the wealthiest, the smartest, the most educated, the most logical, and the most rational. Do they not? The Materialists, Physicalists, Naturalists, Darwinists, Nihilists, Behaviorists, Determinists, Physical Reductionists, and Atheists label themselves as the Real Scientists and call everyone else the fakes or the creationists. These people define “science” as Materialism, Naturalism, Darwinism, Nihilism, and Atheism.

Do you see a pattern here?

These people are explaining-it-by-naming-it. These people are defining their opposition out of existence by categorically denying their existence. These people teach and preach that Psyche, Non-Locality, Non-Physicality, Quantum Non-Local Consciousness, Syntropy, Action at a Distance, the Quantum Zeno Effect, Quantum Entanglement, and various other Quantum Mechanisms or Supernatural Mechanisms DO NOT EXIST. They explain it by naming it! They explain it by calling it non-existent. That’s a logic fallacy because it’s NO explanation at all.

Science is all about explaining the phenomena that have been experienced and observed. Science IS observation and experience, or it should be. Gravity, magnetism, the strong and weak nuclear forces, light waves, dark matter, dark energy, the zero-point field of light, the quantum zeno effect, quantum waves, action at a distance, and Psyche are invisible non-physical Forces and Fields that have been experienced and observed. Materialism and Naturalism have NO explanation for them except to say that they do not exist; yet, their verified and proven existence falsifies Materialism, Naturalism, Darwinism, and their derivatives.

The false is falsified by the truth; and, the truth is repeatedly experienced and observed. It’s fascinating how that works!

Observation and experience ARE a better explanation for Science than Materialism and Naturalism. Materialism and Naturalism provide NO explanation at all when it comes to the non-physical and the immaterial Sciences that have been experienced and observed.

Mark My Words

—

Reference

Myers, D. G. (2010). Social Psychology (10th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Source

God Is in the Light: God is light, and in Him is no darkness at all.

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07168S37N

May 18, 2018May 18, 2018

Naturalism Is Logically Flawed

The Logic or Thinking behind Naturalism and Its Derivatives Is Flawed

When it comes to the Philosophy of Science, Science, Personality Theory, Psychology, and the Scientific Method, I discovered that studying and learning the difference between affirming the consequent and negating the consequent is the most interesting and most useful concept that one can study and learn about. It’s the concept that paid the most dividends in the end.

All of the Psychologists and Personality Theorists turn to Joseph F. Rychlak for this information because he pioneered Humanism, and he was twice a president of the APA’s division of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology.

Earlier in his career, Rychlak tended to define “science” as Materialism, Naturalism, Scientism, and Atheism – just like the rest of us. He also tended to define Psychology as Humanism, which is a type of Atheism. However, he adjusted his beliefs and definitions as more information and research became available.

Now, let’s briefly examine the opposite of Spiritualism, Psyche, Syntropy, and Ultimate Cause, something that is called Physicalism or Materialism or Naturalism.

As already mentioned, I have chosen to rely upon Joseph Rychlak for my foundation in philosophy and logic; and, he relied upon Aristotle.

Even though he acknowledged that human reasoning was in part dialectical, Aristotle challenged the validity of the dialectical method. He thought it was of extreme importance to know how a reasoner in dialectical exchanges came to his major premise. The major premise always acts as a precedent – i.e. a meaning occurring first in the succession of a line of meaning extension. Meanings [definitions] which follow in logical order are sequacious – i.e. slavishly compliant with the precedent meanings which have gone before them. Thus, if we accept the precedent major premise “All men are mortal” then by saying “This is a man” it follows necessarily (sequaciously) that “This is a mortal.” However, even if we frame the major premise in the reverse sense, as “All mortals are men,” we would have a necessary extension of meaning of the sort “This is a mortal” leading to “This is a man”. The conclusion arrived at is erroneous because it was begun in an erroneous (major) premise to begin with.

In the dialectical method, maybe what the student offered as the original position A was correct, but maybe it was grossly incorrect. If the latter case, then any so-called truths emerging from this discourse would be tainted. Aristotle thus challenged the Socratic dialectical view that a line of study can begin in error and end in truth. If we begin in error, Aristotle said, we must necessarily end in error. This too is a precedent-sequacious fact of mental life. To end in truth our methods of inquiry (organons) had better begin in truth. A demonstrative reasoner always makes certain that his major premise is what Aristotle called primary and true.

(Rychlak, 1979, Discovering Free Will and Personal Responsibility, p. 58).

Materialism and Naturalism start with a falsehood as their major premise – namely, that the non-physical, the invisible, the supernatural, and the quantum do not exist. Since Materialism, Naturalism, and their derivatives begin in error, they must necessarily end in error. Everything derived from Materialism and Naturalism is fruit from the poisoned tree. Their major premises have been falsified by observational evidence; therefore, anything derived from them such as Nihilism, Darwinism, and Atheism must be in error as well.

I love to run Materialism and its derivatives through the different forms of logical reasoning in order to see how they stack up. Employing every type of logic and reasoning available, I have observed that Materialism and Naturalism do not fare well under logical and rational scrutiny.

The Major Premise of Materialism is that physical matter is all that exists. Only physical matter exists; and, there’s no such thing as the immaterial, the non-physical, the psyche, or the spiritual.

There is Materialism in a nut-shell. Its definition is its major premise; and, there is also the sum total of ALL the science and the evidence supporting Materialism. It’s all tied up in the major premise. If you take that leap of faith and assume Materialism’s major premise to be true, then the sciences of Darwinism, Behaviorism, Scientific Naturalism, Determinism, Scientism, Abiogenesis, and Spontaneous Generation automatically and necessarily follow. Millions of Atheists, Naturalists, Materialists, and Darwinists have taken this blind leap of faith and accepted Materialism’s Major Premise as true and irrefutable. The whole of their science is based upon the assumption that physical matter is all that exists, because once they admit that the immaterial or the spiritual exists, then they are no longer Materialists and Naturalists and must look for some other way to explain Reality.

Now, let us run Darwinism through this sequacious process starting with Materialism’s Major Premise:

Physical matter is all that exists.

Therefore, physical matter or inanimate matter was the only thing that existed before the first genomes and the first life forms were designed, programmed, created, and manufactured.

Consequently, the rocks or various different forms of physical matter designed, created, programmed, engineered, and manufactured the first genomes and life forms on this planet.

It’s logical. If you accept the major premise as true and irrefutable, then the consequents follow logically and rationally. Physical matter is all that exists; consequently, the rocks designed and created the first genomes and life forms on this planet. Darwinism (the Theory of Evolution) in its most fundamental or reduced form is Creation by Rocks or Spontaneous Generation; and, so is Materialism and Naturalism.

However, if the major premise is false, then the consequents and the conclusions are false as well.

The verified and proven existence of gravity, dark matter, dark energy, magnetism, light, quantum non-locality, quantum entanglement, action at a distance, and thought have demonstrated beyond a shadow of a doubt that Materialism and Naturalism are false. Magnetism is action at a distance. Spirit is light; and, light is spirit. The abundant empirical evidence from NDEs, SDEs, OBEs, and other Spiritual Experiences proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that Materialism is false, and that some kind of non-local consciousness or psyche really does exist and really does survive bodily death and brain death.

ALL of the scientific evidence and empirical evidence that we have available to us proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that Materialism’s Major Premise is false. Invisible and non-physical forces and fields such as gravity, magnetism, thoughts, quantum waves, psyche, the strong and weak nuclear forces, the zero-point field, dark matter, and dark energy falsify Materialism’s Major Premise. Physical matter isn’t the only thing that exists.

Since Materialism begins in falsehood, it must necessarily end in falsehoods. Materialism begins in error, continues in error, and ends in error. When it comes to Darwinism, Materialism, Naturalism, and their derivatives, all of the conclusions arrived at are erroneous because the Major Premise of Materialism is erroneous. Any so-called truths deriving from Materialism and Naturalism are tainted because Materialism’s Major Premise is demonstrably false. Since Materialism is nothing more than pure philosophy or religion or dogma, it can be dispatched with nothing more than philosophy or metaphysics.

Materialism and Naturalism are thoughts or ideas – there’s nothing material or physical about them! Think about it. You will NEVER find a molecule of Materialism, or Naturalism, or Darwinism because these things are non-physical thoughts or non-physical quantum waves to begin with.

I and many others have observed that Materialism of any kind is based upon a refusal to look at evidence. My Materialism and My Atheism were based upon a refusal to look at any contradictory evidence. Materialism is deliberately limited and purposefully exclusionary. Materialism is an extremely poor foundation from which to do philosophy and science because Materialism deliberately eliminates the most interesting scientific disciplines from consideration. Rocks can’t do philosophy and science. That’s just the reality of the situation. The rocks did NOT design and create and produce our proteins, genes, genomes, eyes, brains, and physical bodies. Entropy would prevent the rocks from doing so. There’s no such thing as spontaneous generation. Spontaneous generation has been falsified by Science.

Once we know that Materialism is false and why it is false, then we can no longer use Materialism and Naturalism as our model of reality nor as our basis for science. Consequently, we find ourselves looking for a better and more sustainable model for reality. This is where Psyche and Ultimate Cause come in for the rescue. Psyche is the ultimate causal agent. I suggest for your consideration that the Ultimate Cause Model of Reality is a much better and more sustainable model of reality than Materialism and Naturalism. Psyche or Quantum Non-Local Consciousness has actually been experienced and observed – caught in the wild; whereas, the Major Premises of Materialism and Naturalism have not.

Psyche is the Ultimate Cause, meaning that Psyche is the ultimate causal agent and Psyche is the fundamental unit of reality. We know that this must be true because Materialism and Naturalism are demonstrably false. We know that Psyche as the Ultimate Cause must be true because Quantum Mechanics teaches us that some kind of non-local consciousness must exist in order for physical matter to be brought into existence in the first place. We know that Psyche is the Ultimate Cause and that non-local consciousness truly exists because all of the empirical evidence from NDEs, SDEs, and OBEs tells us that it is so. ALL of the evidence that we have tells us that Materialism is false and that Psyche or Syntropy is real and truly exists.

Psyche has always existed as the Ultimate Cause just waiting for one of us to come along and give it a formal name and a role in causality.

Ask yourself, “What was there before the first particle of physical matter was designed, created, and brought into existence?”

We were!

Our non-local consciousness or psyche was there before the first particle of physical matter was brought into existence. Quantum Mechanics tells us that this is so because Quantum Mechanics tells us that psyche or non-local consciousness is a necessary prerequisite in order to bring physical matter into existence.

I’m going with the Science and the Empirical Evidence on this one, and not the materialistic philosophy and the wishful thinking of the Atheists. Now you know why I’m no longer a Materialist and no longer an Atheist. I know better now.

Mark My Words

—

Source

The Ultimate Model of Reality: Psyche Is the Ultimate Cause

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B071NC9JK6