No Explanatory Power
Observe carefully and you will see that Materialism, Naturalism, Darwinism, Nihilism, Atheism, and their derivatives have NO explanatory power when it comes to Psyche or Syntropy. Psyche is Syntropy. It is without a beginning of days or an end of years. It is eternal and everlasting.
Psyche has been experienced and observed by Near-Death Experiencers and Out-of-Body Explorers. Psyche is observed as being a pin-prick of light or a spark. Psyche or Intelligence is experienced first-hand or first-person as an immaterial viewpoint in space. A spirit body (and later a physical body) expands the range and the scope of a Spark or a Psyche exponentially. Doesn’t it?
Quantum Mechanics is Syntropy – it’s eternal and everlasting, without a beginning of days or an end of years. Physical matter and entropy had a beginning which means that they can theoretically have an end, when they get absorbed back into Syntropy.
Classical Physics or Physicalism has NO explanatory power when it comes to Quantum Mechanics, Psyche, and Syntropy. The Materialists and Naturalists can’t explain Psyche, Quantum Mechanics, Consciousness, nor Syntropy in any way that makes logical sense to them or to us. Instead, these people assure us that these things do not exist. That’s how they explain them, by stating that they do not exist. But, does that really explain them? Is that really science?
Materialism, Naturalism, Physicalism, Darwinism, Nihilism, Behaviorism, Determinism, Physical Reductionism, and Atheism make for Bad Science because they are severely lacking when it comes to explanatory power.
Science is observation and experience. In contrast, the major premises or hidden assumptions of Materialism, Naturalism, Darwinism, Nihilism, and Atheism have NEVER been experienced nor observed. They can’t be because they are a figment of the imagination. They don’t exist in any real physical sense.
Technically, natural selection doesn’t even exist – not in any real tangible physical form. It’s an idea – survival of the fittest – and nothing more. Natural selection doesn’t exist as a person, or a force, or a physical mechanism that can produce genetic change or genetic programming. Natural selection doesn’t do anything. Natural selection doesn’t touch our genes! The only time it comes into play is when you get selected against and die. Natural selection results in death or extinction – it’s entropy. There’s NO physical mechanism for growth, or change, or progress, or programming, or genetic design associated natural selection. Natural selection is nothing but luck or chance; and, every scientist knows that blind luck cannot design and create anything at all.
In principle, natural selection is a philosophical assumption – a figment of the imagination. It’s something that they made up out of thin air to explain their philosophical ideas or their religion. They explained it by naming it. There’s NO physical mechanism associated with natural selection that can produce genetic change or evolution. Scary, is it not? They built a whole “science discipline” on something that doesn’t touch our genes and can’t touch our genes.
The idea that aggression is an instinct collapsed as the list of supposed human instincts grew to include nearly every conceivable human behavior. Nearly 6,000 supposed instincts were enumerated in one 1924 survey of social science books. The social scientists had tried to explain social behavior by naming it. It’s tempting to play this explaining-by-naming game: “Why do sheep stay together?” “Because of their herd instinct.” “How do you know they have a herd instinct?” “Just look at them: They’re always together!”
Instinct theory also fails to account for the variations in aggressiveness from person to person and culture to culture. How would a shared human instinct for aggression explain the difference between the peaceful Iroquois before White invaders came and the hostile Iroquois after the invasion? Although aggression is biologically influenced, the human propensity to aggress does not qualify as instinctive behavior. (Social Psychology, p. 356.)
Natural selection, the theory of evolution, and survival of the fittest are also based upon explaining-by-naming or a carefully crafted tautology. It’s a house of straw with no foundational support.
“Why did those chimp-like ancestors survive when everything else went extinct?” “Because of natural selection or survival of the fittest.” “How do you know that it was natural selection that preserved them and kept them alive?” “Well just look at them: They survived!”
There’s the sum-total of the theory of evolution right there in a nutshell. It’s obvious that the theory of evolution and natural selection are true – just look at all the critters that survived! It’s obvious and clear that natural selection and random mutations can design and create anything they set their minds to, because here you are.
They explained it by naming it! That’s a logic fallacy!
The whole theory of evolution is based upon a bunch of different logic fallacies such as these. Logic fallacies or falsehoods can’t be used to build the truth; but, that doesn’t stop the Materialists, Naturalists, Darwinists, and Atheists from trying to do so. Nevertheless, the whole of their “science” is nothing more than a carefully crafted deception and lie. It’s a fictional just-so story that they made up out of nothing. They explained it by naming it.
Natural selection doesn’t do anything. Natural selection doesn’t touch our genes. The physical process that does the change within our genes is the random mutations that take place during genetic recombination while our gametes (egg and sperm) are being made. Genetic recombination is the mechanism of change where evolution or genetic drift is concerned.
Yes, the genes are real. Yes, random mutations do indeed happen. But, random mutations are entropy; and, entropy cannot design and create. Entropy can only do disorder, disease, cancer, death, and extinction. There’s NOTHING there within the theory of evolution that can actually design and create. There’s nothing within the theory that can do programming, or the production of brand new genes and proteins from atoms. There’s NO physical mechanism within the theory of evolution that can produce proteins and their matching genes from scratch or from atoms. There’s NO science! The theory of evolution was explained into existence by being named into existence. In other words, it’s a fictional story that they made up out of thin air.
By the way, when it comes to psychology, it should have been called a Genetic Perspective and not the evolutionary perspective. The theory of evolution is in constant dispute; whereas, the genes are not. The genes are science because they have been experienced and observed; whereas, creation by Mutation/Selection has not. Random mutations and natural selection cannot design and create anything. It’s physically impossible. They are prevented from doing so by entropy or the second law of thermodynamics. Materialism, Naturalism, Darwinism, Nihilism, Atheism, and Classical Physics are based upon entropy. Entropy cannot design and create. It requires some type of Syntropy in order to be able to design and create proteins and their matching genes from scratch.
ONLY Syntropy, Intelligence, or Someone Psyche can design and create. By choosing to bring Psyche, Quantum Mechanics, and Syntropy into play, we can literally explain everything that comes our way. Try it. You might like it. I know I did. I’m a scientist; and, I have observed that Psyche or Syntropy has an infinite amount of explanatory power. In comparison with that, Materialism, Naturalism, and Darwinism are absolutely worthless because they have NO explanatory power when it comes to the science that matters most.
Ask yourself, “How do the Materialists and Naturalists explain Psyche, Syntropy, and Action at a Distance?”
What’s the answer?
Remember, Action at a Distance as well as the Quantum Zeno Effect have been experienced and observed in science experiments. They are real. They truly exist.
The Materialists, Naturalists, Darwinists, Nihilists, and Atheists explain Psyche, Syntropy, and Action at a Distance by labeling them or categorizing them as NON-EXISTENT. Once again, these people explain-it-by-naming-it or explain it by labeling it as non-existent; but, is that really a scientific explanation, or is it a dodge?
So, ask yourself, “When it comes to science, who are the Real Scientists and who are the fakes?”
Well, what do we observe?
We observe the New Atheists calling themselves the Brights. The Atheists in general label themselves as the wealthiest, the smartest, the most educated, the most logical, and the most rational. Do they not? The Materialists, Physicalists, Naturalists, Darwinists, Nihilists, Behaviorists, Determinists, Physical Reductionists, and Atheists label themselves as the Real Scientists and call everyone else the fakes or the creationists. These people define “science” as Materialism, Naturalism, Darwinism, Nihilism, and Atheism.
Do you see a pattern here?
These people are explaining-it-by-naming-it. These people are defining their opposition out of existence by categorically denying their existence. These people teach and preach that Psyche, Non-Locality, Non-Physicality, Quantum Non-Local Consciousness, Syntropy, Action at a Distance, the Quantum Zeno Effect, Quantum Entanglement, and various other Quantum Mechanisms or Supernatural Mechanisms DO NOT EXIST. They explain it by naming it! They explain it by calling it non-existent. That’s a logic fallacy because it’s NO explanation at all.
Science is all about explaining the phenomena that have been experienced and observed. Science IS observation and experience, or it should be. Gravity, magnetism, the strong and weak nuclear forces, light waves, dark matter, dark energy, the zero-point field of light, the quantum zeno effect, quantum waves, action at a distance, and Psyche are invisible non-physical Forces and Fields that have been experienced and observed. Materialism and Naturalism have NO explanation for them except to say that they do not exist; yet, their verified and proven existence falsifies Materialism, Naturalism, Darwinism, and their derivatives.
The false is falsified by the truth; and, the truth is repeatedly experienced and observed. It’s fascinating how that works!
Observation and experience ARE a better explanation for Science than Materialism and Naturalism. Materialism and Naturalism provide NO explanation at all when it comes to the non-physical and the immaterial Sciences that have been experienced and observed.
Mark My Words
—
Reference
Myers, D. G. (2010). Social Psychology (10th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Source
God Is in the Light: God is light, and in Him is no darkness at all.
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07168S37N
Helpful info. Fortunate for me I discovered your site by chance, and I am shocked why this accident did not take place earlier! I bookmarked it.